Screenshots of FIVE (5) additional comments that were sent from the same IP address 66.108.28.27, under different names (so far the total of comments from that IP address is TEN (10). All emails are fake, they all bounced. Names: L (L@l.com), oh (oh@oh.com), oh (oh@ohho.com), L (La@gmail.com), L (L@l.com) The first comment - about bipolar and hypersexuality - it was sent to us one day after Mona's birthday. What was the point of sending us this bizarre and weird comment especially since Mona did not have Bipolar.? Dr. Owen Scott Muir on the other hand has Bipolar by his own admission in interviews, and as stated publicly. (https://patch.com/new-york/williamsburg/crippling-depression-treated-magnets-pioneering-brooklyn-doctor) An anonymous person sent this allegation about the comment: "it looks like OM believes it is an excuse for rape. He has used his mental illness in this way for a long time (like the commenter said about threatening NYU with a lawsuit rather than complete his emergency room training.)" This comment shows this sender has no idea about the excruciating pain I live with on a daily basis. I am not angry. I am broken. Mona was my heart beating outside my body and now she is never again. I helped Mona. My husband and I, in addition to other family members helped as much as we could, we did everything Mona asked us to do. My conscience is clean on that. The guilt I live with is for not having checked thoroughly those two doctors. Had we known they have mental illnesses themselves, we would have never hired them to treat our beloved daughter who had gone through so much already due to misdiagnosis. The SMS texts exchanges between Mona and both husband and wife clearly show that both doctors wrote highly inappropriate texts about their personal lives, triggered Mona, and terrified her on a regular basis. The comments that came from the same IP address 66.108.28.27 clearly show this person to be intimate with Dr. Owen Scott Muir: this person knew about the judge's decision and sent it to us in a comment instantly, before our own attorney had a chance to let us know; this person sent us an explanation about bipolar hypersexuality for reasons only they would know a day after Mona's birthday; this person claims to know, to remember Mona while she was alive; this person wrote they "loved Mona". As an aside Dr. Owen Scott Muir wrote us in an email that:"Loving Mona was often like washing the dead..." This comment is in reply to the reply comment from the rape allegation from a woman who studied in Amherst at the same time as Dr. Owen Scott Muir, and alleges he raped her. This person tries to deflect the attention from all allegations by constantly attacking me, a grieving mother, whose daughter is never again. More comments below in reaction to posts on the Blog from the same IP address 66.108.28.27, with different names, and fake emails that bounced. This person wrote at least 10 comments hiding behind fake names, fake emails, made horrible, and cruel attacks. This person seems to be obsessed with comments about the Negligence and Malpractice lawsuit against Dr. Owen Scott Muir in particular, and shows they have intimate knowledge of Dr. Owen Scott Muir (addressing him as "Owen" in comments).. It seems like this person might have been stalking this Blog, since they kept sending a new comment to new posts. From the same IP address: 66.108.28.27.
There are more comments that came from different IP addresses, the writing style is similar to these, like these 10 comments, the different IP addresses also have multiple comments with fake names, fake emails. I will post them another time.
0 Comments
- In the Comments page I wrote about comments sent via the previous Comments App; they came with IP Addresses.
I will post some screenshots. There are at least TEN (10) Comments that came from the same IP address: 66.108.28.27, located in New York, NY. The IT Tech believes a VPN might have been used to hide their true location - that it was used by the same person who posted these 10 comments under different names.: Bela, Have (or Hal), Jennifer, Oh (or Lal), Oh (or Oh@Ohio.com), Mona's friend, L (or La)., L (L@l.com), oh (oh@ohho.com), L (L@l.com) The IP service provider is the same for all comments: Charter Communication (owned by Spectrum).. Host name nyc.res-rr.com. NONE OF MONA'S FRIENDS LIVE IN THAT AREA. We asked Mona's friends, none had services provided by Charter Communication. The following three (3) comments were made on 10/24/2019, 10/25/2019/ 11/05/2019, under 3 different names: Bela, Have (or Hal), and Jennifer. They are about the Negligence and Malpractice court case. These comments came immediately after the judge's decision, even before our attorney had a chance to contact us with the judge's decision. I ask any rational person: Who would be so hell bent in posting those comments as soon as the court gave the decision? None of Mona's friends were in the court. None of Mona's family members were in the court. The media was not in court. Nothing was written about the court decision. Who would go the extra mile to verify whether our attorneys firm specializes in medical practice? it might not be their specialty but they do have a good track record in medical malpractice. The judge did not deny our case had no merit. The judge agreed with defendants' claim that it was "a wrongful death case filed past the statute of limitations." These comments are too personal. Who would have the immediate knowledge of the judge's decision, and jump to make these comments? |
REMEMBERING
|